RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: As the surgical burden grows, increasing patient safety during anesthesia and surgery becomes a major global public health priority. Anesthesia can be safely administered in higher-income countries, yet it is more challenging in third-world countries. This study focuses on Sudan, a third-world country, and its unmet anesthetic needs before the current war and how these needs might compromise the post-war status. AIM: The aim of this study is to compare Sudan's outstanding anesthesia requirements to the World Health Organization's safe anesthesia practice standards in terms of workforce, medications, equipment, and anesthesia conduct. METHODS: This study was carried out in four hospitals (Wad Medani Teaching Hospital, Wad Medani Maternity Hospital, Gezira Centre for Renal and Urological Surgeries, and the National Centre for Pediatric Surgeries) in Wad Medani, two of which were referral and two were state-run. Each hospital from every category was identified using a convenience sampling technique. The World Health Organization-World Federation of Societies of Anesthesiologists International Standard and earlier regional African publications were used to determine the minimum predicted safe anesthesia needs. RESULTS: The results of our study demonstrate that overall, the hospitals surveyed fulfilled the minimum standards set by the World Health Organization and the World Federation of Societies of Anesthesiologists (WHO-WFSA) for safe anesthesia practice by 73% with no significant difference in the safety of anesthesia practice between state and referral hospitals. CONCLUSIONS: The state of safe anesthesia care in Wad Medani hospitals surveyed fell well short of the expected minimal criteria due to important requirements such as patient monitoring indicators, the inaccessibility of life-saving facilities such as defibrillators, and difficult intubation instruments. More importantly, the conduct of anesthesia was far below the standard.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: In this study, we share our experience of different operative techniques undertaken on 584 eumycetoma patients in the Gezira Mycetoma Center. METHODS: This is a retrospective, descriptive, hospital-based study, conducted to review the surgical treatment of eumycetoma patients. We included all patients diagnosed with eumycetoma who underwent a surgical operation in the center during January 2013-December 2016. RESULTS: A total number of 1654 patients were seen during the study period, and their records were revised, while 584 (35.3%) of them underwent an operation and included in the study. There was a male predominance 446 (76.4%). Surgical excision of mycetoma was the commonest operation performed among 513 (87.8%) patients in comparison with amputation 71 (12.2%). Below-knee amputation and toe amputation are the commonest types of amputation in 36 (6.1%) and 14 (2.3%) patients, respectively. Clinical features determining the type of operation performed included the size of the lesion, whether or not a bone was involved, and the feasibility of primary closure. A wide surgical excision (WSE) is performed mainly when the bone is not involved and when moderate or primary closure is possible or reconstruction is feasible. Amputations will typically follow identifying bone involvement, secondary infection, and an already disabled patient. CONCLUSION: The commonest procedure in our series was WSE and primary skin closure undertaken when the lesion was small (< 5 cm); there was no bone involvement, and the skin closure was achievable. Larger lesions (> 10 cm) without bone involvement were treated with excision and flap/graft. Bone involvement and large primary lesions were more likely to be managed by amputation. Recurrent and relapse of mycetoma were observed in patients with bone involvements or presented with recurrent mycetoma for the second time.
